I've been waiting and waiting and I finally got The Dark Tower audiobook in at the library. I have listed to five of the Dark Tower books on audio (I read The Gunslinger, listened to the next three while driving to Texas, and listened to books five and six driving to and from work and college classes). I've had book 7 since it came out (my husband likes to read them first) but I've enjoyed listening to them so I waited. Also, it's kind of sad knowing that this is the end. The last one. I have really enjoyed this series.
King has never been a favorite writer. I've only read a few of his titles. I read Pet Sematary in high school and scared myself nearly to death because I was alone at the time. I read The Stand because my husband bugged me and bugged me to read it for two years. And I read Eyes of the Dragon when I found out it was connected to The Dark Tower series. I know there are others, but I just don't have the interest or the energy to seek them out right now.
But I love the Dark Tower series. I think it is clear that this is a series with all of the author's passion and creativity invested in it. It has a clear arc and has very detailed and well-imagined characterizations. I has many literary and cultural allusions. It is a combination of western, fantasy, and science fiction, and these genres are all among my favorites.
Anyway, book 7 on audion is 29 hours long! I figure that between driving to work (fifteen minutes, twice a day, five times a week) and driving to class (45 minutes, twice a day, twice a week), it will take me about five weeks to get through the whole book. But what will I do then? I might have to resort to fanfiction.
Saturday, April 16, 2005
Relieved
Can I just say that I am so glad that tax season is done? This is a miserable time of year at the library. Everybody wants help. Where are the tax forms? I didn't see such-and-such form (I walk to tax table, pick up form, put in their hand, smile nice and say you're welcome if I'm lucky enough to get a thank you). Do I need Form A or Form B? (How would I know? Do I look like an accountant? I bet they don't wear jeans to work. I don't know you. I don't know if you're single/married, if you own a house, if you go to college, if you donate money, if you cashed out your mutual fund this year, whatever. How the hell am I going to know what form you need?) And then there are the people who come for tax help with AARP. They line up with LAWN CHAIRS outside the door AN HOUR before we open and tell our EMPLOYEES that they have to stand at the end of the line! I swear, it is worse every year. But it's finally done.
Sunday, April 10, 2005
Since you've all heard the "I'm busy" excuse before ...
(and though I have been) ... I'll try to be a little more forthright. I'm going to piggyback off Wendy and Alison. I've been online a lot less lately because I'm a little disappointed with the online world. Since I've never really made any tight friendships online, I'm sure no one really cares. But there are things I really like about the online romance community, and things I don't like at all, and this is a post about what I don't like. I don't claim to speak for everyone, and I'm sure there are those who wouldn't like what I have to say at all, but I'm going to say it anyway.
I used to spend a ton of time at AAR. I've never been a heavy poster, but I like the site. But I'm getting tired of the people who've never been to the site before complaining about a bad review of their favorite author's new book. So you're Miss Big Name's bestest buddy and her biggest fan 4eva! We don't care. Come back when you have something useful to say.
I'm tired of the posters there who think they are somehow the den mother appointed to keep everyone else in line, and make sure no one says anything that might possibly be seen as impolite or critical.
And I'm tired of the authors who don't like AAR and places like it. Get over yourselves! There are readers out there who are discriminate and who want to talk about what they like and don't like. And yes, sometimes we might mention your name. That doesn't mean we're saying you're scum or you've got no talent or that we trying to ruin your career or you should die some terrible death. But from the way some (notice I said "some") authors act, you'd think we (and the site administrators) were saying all of those things and worse. And the way some authors think, we're all just different versions of Laurie Gold, or at least paid by her to say such mean things, which is just ludicrous. Like she's the only person in the world with the opinion that authors aren't perfect or above criticism. Like she's the only person in the world who's not your bestest friend or your biggest fan 4eva.
I'm getting a little tired of RTB as well. When some of us talked about the prevalence of author-only posts previously at Alison's blog, I agreed with a few others that there was too much of a focus on author-only issues, and not on reader issues or universal romance issues. The author whose post I used as an example basically said on her site that she didn't give a crap what we thought, that she'd keep writing the same thing. While I respect and agree with everyone's choice to write what they want to, I'm tired of this kind of attitude. RTB isn't anyone's personal blog. If you want to sit on your blog and say "I don't care what you think" then fine, say it. But RTB is supposed to be a COMMUNITY site (at least that's the impression I got) so it would be nice if it reflected the community.
Sylvia's recent post talked about community, Shannon's post on the RITA contoversy was great and obviously garnered a lot of interest. Kassia's was on a good topic, but I would have liked to see more opinion expressed and not so much worry about toe-stepping. I liked Wendy's recent post about librarians (but I might be pre-inclined since I work at a library) because she has a different and unique perspective on romance. But this and this and this and this and this and this (and plenty of others) were boring and of interest only to a select few (which might have been the point).
There are 30 columnists on RTB, and 18 of them are published authors (doesn't that seem a little imbalanced to anyone else?). There are six aspiring authors, two readers, one reviewer, one review site owner, one editor, and one librarian. One of the aforementioned published authors is a former editor, one an ebook author, and one a small press author. Definitely author-heavy and author-centralized. I think it's clear that whoever came up with the idea of RTB (and supposedly there are two of them), at least one of them is an author and they both spend most of their time on other authors' websites and blogs and loops. Not that I dislike authors. I like them. I like their books, and I think some of them have great ideas and great observations. But as a whole they need to stretch themselves. Stop talking so much about your writing process or the "author experience." Some people don't care about that, some have heard it all before, some just want more opinion and more reflection on ROMANCE.
Yeah, the online community seems author-heavy, but that's mostly because the authors are the ones with the high-profile sites and blogs. Readers tend to flit from site to site, maybe with a "home site" or two, but mostly posting a little bit of everywhere. Isn't it interesting to see how few reader sites were listed on RTB when it started, and how many have been added since? And I would definitely like to see some interest in and response to what the readers of RTB think. Seems to me that right now the authors are all trying to impress each other. I'd like to see RTB have a general comment board not connected to a particular post.
I hang out occasionally on other boards, both of other genres and of other topics, but I still come back to the romance community. It's where I started on the internet (well, after the military stuff, but I can't go back there), and it's where I feel most at home. Which sometimes is sad, because there are times, like this last few weeks, that I haven't felt at home here at all.
I used to spend a ton of time at AAR. I've never been a heavy poster, but I like the site. But I'm getting tired of the people who've never been to the site before complaining about a bad review of their favorite author's new book. So you're Miss Big Name's bestest buddy and her biggest fan 4eva! We don't care. Come back when you have something useful to say.
I'm tired of the posters there who think they are somehow the den mother appointed to keep everyone else in line, and make sure no one says anything that might possibly be seen as impolite or critical.
And I'm tired of the authors who don't like AAR and places like it. Get over yourselves! There are readers out there who are discriminate and who want to talk about what they like and don't like. And yes, sometimes we might mention your name. That doesn't mean we're saying you're scum or you've got no talent or that we trying to ruin your career or you should die some terrible death. But from the way some (notice I said "some") authors act, you'd think we (and the site administrators) were saying all of those things and worse. And the way some authors think, we're all just different versions of Laurie Gold, or at least paid by her to say such mean things, which is just ludicrous. Like she's the only person in the world with the opinion that authors aren't perfect or above criticism. Like she's the only person in the world who's not your bestest friend or your biggest fan 4eva.
I'm getting a little tired of RTB as well. When some of us talked about the prevalence of author-only posts previously at Alison's blog, I agreed with a few others that there was too much of a focus on author-only issues, and not on reader issues or universal romance issues. The author whose post I used as an example basically said on her site that she didn't give a crap what we thought, that she'd keep writing the same thing. While I respect and agree with everyone's choice to write what they want to, I'm tired of this kind of attitude. RTB isn't anyone's personal blog. If you want to sit on your blog and say "I don't care what you think" then fine, say it. But RTB is supposed to be a COMMUNITY site (at least that's the impression I got) so it would be nice if it reflected the community.
Sylvia's recent post talked about community, Shannon's post on the RITA contoversy was great and obviously garnered a lot of interest. Kassia's was on a good topic, but I would have liked to see more opinion expressed and not so much worry about toe-stepping. I liked Wendy's recent post about librarians (but I might be pre-inclined since I work at a library) because she has a different and unique perspective on romance. But this and this and this and this and this and this (and plenty of others) were boring and of interest only to a select few (which might have been the point).
There are 30 columnists on RTB, and 18 of them are published authors (doesn't that seem a little imbalanced to anyone else?). There are six aspiring authors, two readers, one reviewer, one review site owner, one editor, and one librarian. One of the aforementioned published authors is a former editor, one an ebook author, and one a small press author. Definitely author-heavy and author-centralized. I think it's clear that whoever came up with the idea of RTB (and supposedly there are two of them), at least one of them is an author and they both spend most of their time on other authors' websites and blogs and loops. Not that I dislike authors. I like them. I like their books, and I think some of them have great ideas and great observations. But as a whole they need to stretch themselves. Stop talking so much about your writing process or the "author experience." Some people don't care about that, some have heard it all before, some just want more opinion and more reflection on ROMANCE.
Yeah, the online community seems author-heavy, but that's mostly because the authors are the ones with the high-profile sites and blogs. Readers tend to flit from site to site, maybe with a "home site" or two, but mostly posting a little bit of everywhere. Isn't it interesting to see how few reader sites were listed on RTB when it started, and how many have been added since? And I would definitely like to see some interest in and response to what the readers of RTB think. Seems to me that right now the authors are all trying to impress each other. I'd like to see RTB have a general comment board not connected to a particular post.
I hang out occasionally on other boards, both of other genres and of other topics, but I still come back to the romance community. It's where I started on the internet (well, after the military stuff, but I can't go back there), and it's where I feel most at home. Which sometimes is sad, because there are times, like this last few weeks, that I haven't felt at home here at all.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
